Alpha finish

This morning I wrote the proverbial “The End” to a novel. The novel is provisionally titled, Not A Man to Back Down, and it is the second book in my Speaker for the Dead series.

My notes say I started it on March 19th, so this was a long slog. To be fair, I stopped work on it to tend to a few short pieces, and even a rewrite of the first chapter of Speaker for the Dead, which is the start of the series. I was sending out packages to agents on SFTD as I started book 2, so there was a lot of cross pollination. Plus I wrote a lot of supporting copy at that time that needed to be done to find an agent, like query letters, synopsis, etc. It’s all writing. Some of it is just not very sexy writing.

Not a Man, (or NAMTBD) is far from being finished. There is still much work to be done. What I did was finish the first pass. My alpha. Next will be a read of the alpha on my kindle, which will probably happen some time in December, so it’s a little less fresh. Already I forgot how much of the novel starts, which is good. The less I know in advance, the more I can find wrong with it. The alpha read will largely be for continuation and to get a feel for what I am missing. Right now I have a sense that there are parts in the front that will need to be rewritten to align better with the back side, but I don’t know for sure. Have to read the thing in one go, like I do every other book, to see how it’s working.

I do this with everything I write, it’s just with a novel it’s much harder. I can keep around 25k words in my head in terms of plotting and such, but even that is tricky. This is why I wrote notes and roughly outline the major plot points on large stories so I write to those points and not necessarily what I remember.

As I read through it, I’ll make edits on my phone, and based on those I will cut and paste the novel into something that is more cohesive. Sometimes this means moving chapters around or writing entirely new ones. Sometimes this means just rewriting a few key sentences to get everything aligned. This novel also has something new, a few very short stories told from the POV of someone who bumps into Lissa Carter Jones, the proverbial Speaker for the Dead. I thought it would be a fun way to show what she is up to, but not in her voice, or the voices of the main characters. They will be dropped in the middle of the novel as a way to break things up and give a better sense of how overwhelmed Lissa is in helping the dead.

Eventually all of this work this will result in a Beta version. It’s at that point, when I am happy the book stands well on its own, that I will send it out to my beta readers.

Drop a line if you want to be in on that hot Beta fun.

In other news, I signed my first professional literary contract this week. Super exciting. My little story C’mon Boys is all gown up and it about to move out to Issue 7 at Baubles From Bones. Snif, sniff. I’ll be posting as soon as I have a link. It should be out early December.

End of Samhain

This morning I got up after sleeping in until 9:00, and started on the dishes. The kitchen is always a mess after Halloween. For some reason cleaning the kitchen is one of those chores that I find relaxing. I can do it without much thinking, and the things I do have to actually think about are of such low consequence, that the decisions feel safe.

We take Halloween seriously at Chez Tolladay. Yesterday I put in over 14k steps setting up all the things we hadn’t gotten to yet in our front yard. In many ways it was our best Halloween yet, in terms of how the house looked. We had very few trick-or-treaters, but that’s a on-going trend. The neighborhood has been slowing changing over the years. There are less middle class families with kids, and more rich older people, or (because we live in an orthodox neighbor) more orthodox jews who do not participate in secular holidays. Still we had fun and the house looked cool. We added a new bubble fogger, and a new witch to the ensemble, which was nice. Mostly we made ourselves happy, which frankly is the goal.

Halloween for us is very much like a theater production. The fun is not in doing the same thing over and over, but in the rush to try to make things new and fresh with that same blank canvas. The fun is not in pleasing the audience, but in building something that meets our ever expanding and harshly critical standards. There was still a lot we didn’t get to, but there’s always next year.

Every year our son had gotten more and more into pumpkin carving. This year we bought out new tools as he experimented with shaving off parts of the outer skin. This lead to a healthy discussion afterwards about carving so the light can come through in some places better than others. In essence, using the thickness of the pumpkin rind as an element to one’s design. We realized more experimentation was in order, then he pointed to the three un-carved pumpkins we have in the yard that I use as props for a singing pumpkins projection. Looks like we’ll be experimenting with them before the end of the week. Looking forward to that.

October was also the first time I went through edits for a story. Gotta say, I found it pretty exciting. Almost everything to do with my story “C’mon Boys” is going to be exiting to me because it’s my first professional sale. Everything is new and fun when seen through that narrow lens. But I’ve also been enjoying the process because the editor I am working with, Joel Troutman, is so very kind. By way of comparison, the notes I get for edits to the art that I work on in my day job are so much more blunt that it is almost comical. It’s like talking to a therapist, and then immediacy afterwards talking to that neighbor from Brooklyn who is one of those types that needs to project their “New Yorker” attitude at everyone.

The story should be out mid December. I will be posting links when I have them.

As to writing, this month was pretty productive. Except for the first week that I missed from illness, I really cranked on the second novel in the Speaker for the Dead series. Yesterday I outlined the last 3 chapters that need writing. Roughly 10k words to go, or about two weeks if I’m being productive. Hopefully, by Mid November I will finally set that beast aside, and turn to some other things.

I also cranked out a very short story (slightly over 1000 words) about visitors from the future coming to Los Angeles. Not sure what I’m going to do with it yet. It will need to go through a month of sitting, and another pass of edits, before being sent to my favorite beta reader (hello Val). After that, we’ll see. Hopefully it will find a good home.

All that to say it’s been a big month for me, writing wise. I have other news, one of my stories is in contention at another small magazine, but I don’t want to say more until I know for sure they will publish it. It looks as if they have more stories than they have space, so they need to do a second round of cuts. Obviously, I hope they pick mine, but they have decisions to make that I am not aware of, and I trust they know what the hell they are doing. Yo, small businesses are hard to manage. I know from experience having started 4 or 5. Regards if they pick me or not, I wish them well.

A short note to mark something of import

This week came just after Mabon, which is the pagan holiday at the equinox that marks the end of Summer and the beginning of Autumn. When I was younger I used to loathe the fall as it brought with it the beginning of school, and the end of summer’s innocence. Now that I am much older, and find the heat of summer to be tiresome, Fall comes as a blessed relief. A time (at least here in LA) when one can open their windows again for large parts of the day. Indeed, this morning when I woke it was 60 degrees outside, the house a cool 74. The house has not seen that temperature but once or twice in three months. This, then, is a great relief.

Plus, Halloween is just around the corner, a holiday I did not learn to appreciate until I became a parent, but I digress….

As it happens, something else of import came to me this week. Joel Troutman, the Editor of Baubles from Bones informed me this past Tuesday he would like to publish my story C’mon Boys. This is a first for me. My first professional sale in fiction. After 14 years of attempting to write sellable fiction––part time, and keeping this weird addiction of mine on a shoe-string budget––it has finally paid off. 

This welcome news came in the middle of an otherwise difficult week. I’d been sick since Monday with a head cold that left me achy and dull-headed. I threw myself into work as a respite. It’s funny how when you are tightly focused upon a difficult task, you take little notice of yourself. I took advantage of this trait all week to both make money and to not dwell too much upon my miserable personal experience. Win/Win.

Many of you might know this, but I get up early to write. For years this has been my habit. Every weekday I get up at 7:00, regardless of when I went to bed, and for the first 2.5 hours of the day I work on my craft. I also feed the cats, put away any dishes from the night before, and do other sundry chores, but most of that time I spend tightly focused on the work. This week, because I was ill, I slept in until 9:30 or 10. It was the first time in many years (perhaps 10 years or more) that I went a full week without writing anything. 

This then, is the irony. The news of my first sale came at my least productive point in many years. 

I have no news so far on the sale except that Joel wishes to purchase my story. Once I know the actual date it will be published you can be sure I will post it here. Obviously there will be links to how to purchase it from Baubles from Bones, when that information is given to me. I’m very proud of this accomplishment, obviously, but also very thankful. In a week full of dull and miserable thoughts, when just getting through was about all I could focus on, this news was a blessing.

It is easy to forget, but I wish to point out that all of my hard work would mean nothing if it wasn’t for other creatives out there, like Joel Troutman and the other fine people at Baubles from Bones who are working hard on their own worlds, trying to make magic happen. Success is never singular, no matter how much we might like to think differently. All of it comes from the hands of others, exactly like the food you eat, the wine you drink, and the smiles you give away. 

Because I wasn’t writing this week, I had a lot of time to my thoughts. I came up with at least one story idea based upon Lissa Carter Jones, the protagonist of my novel Speaker for the Dead. It will likely be a short story separate from the novels. I have one such short set aside already, with the idea that if SftD ever gets published I can use it for readings, or some other way to help market the book.

This past summer I wrote something like 2/3rds of Lissa’s next novel, with the rest mostly outlined and ready to fill in. I was hoping to finish the first draft by Halloween, but after this week that seems unlikely. There are still some 15-20k words or more to go. Even on good days I rarely put out more than 1000 words, and some of the final chapters are going to go more slowly as I try to catch every stray point and set it down. 

Also this week I came up with something to fit into the next “near future” SF story I write. I keep a lot of ideas like this stuffed into a series of text files, which I occasionally mine for ideas. It’s not a story itself, just a little bit of world building that seems both humorous and on point. One of those ideas that when you hear your first thought should be, I wish I’d bought stock in that when it first came out. 

But also…. my thoughts this week––especially after watching our current administration become increasingly lawless in its actions, AND seeing how little effect this seems to have upon the population in general––I started to wonder if the stories that we tell each other have suited us well for our current crisis.

I had this thought especially after reading the second story in that wonderful old read from 1989 Hyperion, by Dan Simmons. Like the first story, The Soldier’s Tale is full of intense extremes. Fedmahn Kassad experiences battles in many places, some of which are real, some of which are computer generated. The scope is large, this is Space Opera here and Simmons is happy to give the reader every bit of that depth. The writing is wonderfully crafted, and very muscular. Simmons rightly earned his Hugo award for this work. When viewed against other SF novels you can see how it came about, a more literate way to attempt a SF novel, but one with a deep knowledge of the past SF masterworks. It strikes me as both being unique, and yet also clearly canonical (in as much as any work can be considered canon). It is big, smart, fast-paced, and extreme in scope. The hero of every adventure not only faces great odds, but insurmountable, totally impossible, you’ve-got-to-be-kidding-me, odds––and yet they still succeed. This is a nice trick to pull off, leaving the reader smarter for having gone down the path with the protagonist. In every way it’s a very satisfying read.

Except, except, at the end of the day it leaves the protagonist alone, and isolated. They exist on a pinnacle of fantastical achievement, but it is a pinnacle that cannot be shared. There are no others in their world. There is only them. It is only their agency that matters, not of the others. Very much a Hero/NPC mindset, in which every “other” the protagonist faces only exists to further his or her story, and have no real story of their own. 

Mind you, this is pretty much the basis for story, at least story from the western (or more specifically, American) lens. My problem is I think there is a flaw to this way of framing the world. Not only in the extremes in which we place our characters (in order to drum up sufficient excitement or interest) but also the way we frame their place in society. 

Heroes are also real people. They exist in the real world. At least the heroes that read these stories do. Remember stories do not exist on their own. They exist in the minds of an audience. A story on its own is not a story, it is nothing. Stories do not exist without readers, without listeners, without an audience. So when we as the audience experience a story of a protagonist facing a living hell, completely alone, are we not taken to that place ourselves? Of course we are. We live their experience. This is why we enjoy being a part of the audience. We get to experience their struggle, without facing any of the risks. And certainly the larger the struggle the greater the payoff. That is the underpinning of much of western story, at least the popular ones. Big powerful, emotive experiences that are also safe. 

But are they helpful?

I ask this because right now our country is going through a clearly transformative time. Much of what we know and believe–in terms of how and why a government should act–is being questioned, and at times upended. We are living in a time that is going to be talked about for years afterwards. It is a time of great change, a change that is transformative as well as extremely damaging. Sadly we have no idea how it’s going to end. We don’t even really know the theme yet for this time. That will come to later historians. All we can say for sure is that living in the middle of a time of great movement is fucking terrifying and bewildering. And the thing I keep seeing is that we are drastically unprepared for it. I mean most of us knew that Hitler was bad, and yet a healthy portion of the population seems to have happily embraced our very American version of that leader. This is not a good thing, by any measure––postwar Germany was a literal hellscape, talk to someone who lived it––and yet I cannot help but worry that we are now heading down that path. 

And the thing that really sat in my craw this week, while I was pushing pixels like a diseased madman, or laying in bed at 4 am, unable to sleep, yet too tired to get up, was how massively we seem unprepared for the times we are in. All these stories about heroes, and today with Marvel movies the heroes are truly muscular, and yet we as individual citizens seem too weak to act. 

What I began to wonder in my fevered state was if we told better stories would we have better outcomes? I suspect we need less individual heroes, and more stories of distributed heroism, where heroes are people who work with others in concert towards a greater goal. Stories of community, not isolation. Stories of communal strength, not individual strength. Stories of compassion and care, versus single-minded conquest. 

The truth is we cannot outsmart our villains, not in the real world, and no matter what the actual odds, but perhaps if we work together we can overcome them. For good citizens to be ready for that experience we need to have been bathed in stories that teach us how to be part of a working team, not how to be a stronger individual. 

So where are these stories? Why aren’t they selling? Who is writing them? 

That’s what I want to know. That’s what I want to write. 

In defense of the book market

David Brooks has just opined on the state of the literary world in a a piece called When Novels Mattered. I stumbled upon it in my facebook feed and responded there. I copied that post here so I could expand a bit on my thoughts.

First of all, David Brooks is a nice man I’m sure, but he’s a columnist at a major newspaper which means he needs to crank out a couple thousand words a week to pay the rent. He’s also a conservative, which means he has a few axes to grind, which he will reliably pull out in almost every column.

In this one we learn literary fiction has taken a blow, in part due technology, and in part due to Liberal groupthink. All of this is pure horseshit. David is a nice guy, but he’s not paid to think far outside of his few check boxes, and it shows. He’s not alone. A lot of people are like this, taking in the world as it appears, and not asking themselves if any of the things they are told are true.

The past month or so I have been digging into the literary world more than normal. Mind you, I’m trying to turn a side hustle-writing fiction-into a low key cash flow, so I have a few cards on the table. One of things I discovered was a bit of the lamenting in the literary world over the loss of the male writer. There is even a shop in the U.K. talking about publishing only male authors. There in fact used to be big bold men, who also happened to be literary darlings, and their voices drove a lot of interest and/or book sales. Their cultural value was indeed immense, but they also existed in a much different literary market, one that was much smaller, and also male focused.

But dig me now, EVERYTHING used to be like that.

There used to be more gate keepers, and less novels. This is a fact. Our culture had fewer voices to aggragate around, and most of them were male. Genre fiction was relegated to a much small piece of the book publishing pie, and woman writers were rare. Popular women writers were very rare. This also happened to be the same time that we had only four television networks, with only a few slowly expanding cable channels as competition. Culture was constrained back then, not by desire but by technology. There simply was no easy way to find books outside of the ones pushed by publishers. You got what they sold you, and what they sold you was bold male voices.

I know we like to think of our favorite cultural amusements as being significant, but in a capitalist society like ours, every cultural item you find is actually a commodity packaged and sold just as much as the food in your grocery cart. Books, television, movies, computers games, all of them are products which are packaged and sold.

What the internet has done was flip the script in terms of selling products. In today’s world you can actually seek out books that appeal to you. They are not just handed down from the big publishers. This means more voices are being published, over more genres than ever before. More books are being published as well, not just by the big five publishers, but by a huge amount of self-publishers. Among other things, this means that the current market is much more reflective of the choices of the buying public, and much less reflective of what book publishers want to sell.

Books are not the only art form affected by the internet. Music has radically shifted (there are many more bands selling much more music, in expanding genres, with the average income dropping, and fewer rich musicians), so has movies, television, and video games. That is to say the medium in which we consume art has made the process far more individualized and idiosyncratic. It used to be you were stuck with Norman Mailer because that was all everyone was talking about. Now if you roam the literary web for long you are going to be bombarded by hundreds of voices, each of them telling you how great their favorite books are, and each of their picks will be different.

For years there have been more women readers than men. Now there are also more women writers than men. There are reasons for both of these trends, but they are facts. This is the current market. My reading of the room is that woman’s voices appeal to women readers. They don’t need literary bad boys, telling them about themselves and the world. They need voices more like their own, with solutions more like what they know works. Hence the trend towards mixed genres like Romantasy, cozy mysteries, and solar punk. All of them are essentially taking a page from romance and woman’s books, by removing much of the gunpowder and violence, and replacing it with complicated and “community” solutions into their plots.

I stumbled upon this when I began the process of trying to find a literary agent. Since the beginning of the year I have read hundreds of different agents “wish lists” trying to find one who might be interested in my work. This is a very bizarre lens with which to view the literary world, but it does offer some perspective. I can tell you that literary agents are almost exclusively women. The ratio is at least 10 to 1, but probably higher. To a woman, they are looking for strong literary voices that jump off the page. I’ve read variations on that phrase so often that I can recite it in my sleep. The people who make a living selling authors to publishers all want to back a horse that can win the literary tripple crown. If there are writers like that out there, you can be assured they will find them. This tells me that the actual people who can who can write in a bold new voice are exceedingly rare, but also I think the value for such a voices are much lower.

Look at the books that are selling. Look at the genres that are expanding. This is where readers tastes are going. These are the books that readers are reading. Reading still has a huge cultural value, literature is still hugely paramount. There are things that cannot be said in long form fiction outside of a novel. Right now that means more books are being written about the black experience, the lgbtq+ experience, and largest of all, the female experience. This is what is selling, and it’s leaving a mark on our culture.

If you’re a man, and used to having white, CIS male, voices being centered in your culture, you’re going to see the world like David Brooks does. It will feel like a loss, even though white CIS male writers still dominate the cash flow. If you’re interested in hearing marginalized voices finally getting their say, then you’re in luck, because for the first time in recorded history that is happening right now. Regardless of what you think about the merits of these voices, it is a marvelous thing that it can happen.

From my experience, I would say that we’re in the middle of a renaissance in literature. There has never been a bigger table with more flavors. There are just less big platters, and more smaller bowls. You can still only eat so much, only now there are far more choices.

The Big Beautiful Bill, and what it means

This week the Trump administration passed a very large and possibly the only legislation they will accomplish this year. There are a lot of articles about what it means and what it will do to and for America, but I’m going to set those aside. If you’re reading this long after July 4th 2025, Google will no doubt lead you to everything you need to know.

I wanted to save this space to talk about two things: Predictions about what will happen in the future because of this bill, and specifics about how it will affect our finances.

The Future

There has been a lot and hand wringing from the left over this bill. Some of it for what I think is good reason, and some of it for more incendiary reasons. I’m going to try and steer away from the more hyperbolic ideas, but I don’t know if this will be helpful or not. Predicting the future is hard, yo.

On the whole I don’t think the Big Beautiful Bill will change much. I suspect it will effect us less than most of my friend on the left might think. In part because the cuts to SNAP will not start until October 2027, and many of the changes to medicare (like work requirements) will not start until December 2026. That is to say the bill that the American people will have to pay for it will not come due for a few years yet. I don’t know that this will help Democrats in the mid-term elections as the voters they are appealing to may not have noticed the looming bill by November 2026.

And the more positive side, the tax cuts sold in this bill are not really tax cuts. They are merely keeping the existing ones passed by Trump in 2017, which would otherwise have expired next year. They are not current taxes that will be saved, they are future taxes that were averted. So except for small areas like in Social security (see below) there is not going to be a huge influx of cash to regular voters.

Financially, It would be reasonable to suggest that the BBB will move past and not leave much of a wake. Oh politicians are gonna talk about it endlessly. If nothing else the Republicans have put their names to a piece of legislation that gives the largest cut in public assistance in American history, while also running up the deficit. For those that pay attention to such things, it will leave a mark. But I don’t know that the average American is going to notice or care.

The thing I think will have the largest impact is going to be where much of the money in the BBB is directed. Trump wants to deport as many undocumented workers as he can, and with this bill ICE is suddenly going to find itself with a massive inflow of cash. The budgets for everything from prisons to detainee transportation went up 10 times or more. If you couple this with the tactics that ICE has been using the past 5 months, it starts to look like a recipe for disaster. Even prior to this bill, we’ve been seeing that many undocumented workers are either self-deporting, or lying low. This directly affects agricultural production, meat processing, and the construction industry, just to name a few areas. What it will mean for the future is hard to guess, but nothing good. I predict we will see an increase in the price of food, and home repair. Because every undocumented worker is already plugged into our economy, having them leave or working less is also going to depress the economy for everyone. I predict we will see either slow or sluggish growth for the next 2-3 years. If Trump carries through with his planned deportation of 3000 immigrants a day (and he will have the manpower from this bill) we will fall into a recession.

That’s just the financial effects. What that will do for us as a country is a whole other thing. There’s another implication to ICE and its huge budget that is lost on many. The way Trump has been using ICE it is as much his own private police force as it is a national one. It is very possible that citizens will start to get taken off the streets for reasons other than being undocumented. I would not be surprised if the number of political prisoners we’re seeing (which are right now mostly pro-Palestinian protesters) were to substantially increase. Regular citizens could be rounded up by unmarked agents and sent out of state or out of the country with no trial or notification. I know this sounds totally crazy pants, but I predict this is exactly what is going to happen. We’re going to slowly become more and more a police state with any opposition becoming political prisoners, while Congress looks on and does nothing, with little in the way of legal protections.

That is the thing I fear the most, and yet seems the most likely. Hopefully, I will be wrong, but I very much doubt it. Time will tell.

One last point. Our standing in the world is not so great right now. As I type this millions of people around the world will likely die thanks to Trump stopping the USAID program. How this administration treats other countries is also noticed. Our treatment of Ukraine is especially troublesome. Other countries are going to look at Trump’s actions and realize that if this is how American treats its allies, then maybe they need to not engage with us. This had implications well above the business level, and none of them are good. We’ll have to see how it all plays out.

Finances

On Thursday, July 3, the Social Security Administration sent us an email. I assume it was sent to everyone who is registered with SS or about to retire. This is highly unusual. I don’t know that the agency has ever used its resources and private information in such a way before. It is blatant advertising, and also misleading.

This is what it looked like. This link takes you to a similar page on the SSA site.

I started digging around and found some sources that were a lot more accurate.

GovFacts.org This is long, but in-depth, also covered similar bills.
AARP This is shorter and a little broader in scope.

The TL/DR is the new bill doesn’t cut taxes, it instead offers a larger “bonus” deduction of $6k per individual. This deduction is available to everyone who is 65 and over, and makes less than $200k/year ($175k/year for those filling single). It is also only going to last until 2029. After that it will be gone.

What this means is complicated, because our tax system is complicated. If you’re living on SS and make enough money to file taxes, then unless you are rich this will be an absolute benefit. If you don’t make enough money to file taxes, this will not help you at all. So it’s a very precise and targeted relief but only for the middle class retired or soon to be retied set, and only for a limited time. Which is not really what the email suggests.

Since I am 62, I will get only this benefit only in the last year it is offered. Because my wife is slightly older, Teri will get the benefit more than me. We file jointly, so technically we will both benefit from this at some point.

Is this good for us? Yes, without question. It might carve as much as $3k off of our tax bill, depending on a lot of factors. My income is not set because I am self-employed, and because my clients pay me in a variety of ways (some pay W-2 income and some pay 1099 income), so it makes if very hard to guess how much it will effect us.

What will affect us, without question, is the cuts to the advanced tax credits for the ACA, which is how we are insured. I haven’t looked at the numbers recently, but I would not be surprised if the monthly premiums on our already rock bottom insurance (bronze level) will double. We’re looking at something like an additional $400-$600/month. Yikes. Mind you, before the ACA on the open market we paid even more than that, so we’re not exactly surprised. Just sad.

The irony is, once we turn 65 we’ll be eligible for Medicaid, so we will no longer be on the ACA. So right at the time that our medical insurance will stop (not entirely, because you still have monthly premiums for medicaid) we’ll get an additional tax break. The net effect is we are going to loose money up until we each turn 65, and then we will loose less money. And that doesn’t count how the economy as a whole will affect us. Who knows what that will be.

As far as I know, these are the only two areas that will directly affect our finances. Time will tell. But in the main it looks like a net loss of something like $6k/year, dropping down to maybe $3k/year in four years.

Joy.

More on the Narrative

Last month I posted something long on the nature of story and how it seemed to be intrinsic to every human endeavor; foundational to our language processing as it were. So a few weeks back I started actually researching this. Turns out my assumptions were largely correct. My local library had several of the books I had run across in my searching, and as I type this they are all collected near my reading chair. Slowly I am making my way through them.

I am taking notes, scribbling furiously in their electronic margins. This is big. I have a feeling this is going to end up being a book. Let me tell you, it’s a lot.

Just one of the things I discovered was this: Humans are such a social species that we cannot measure ourselves except by using others as a kind of calibration or reflection. That is, we measure ourselves through the same lens that we use to measure others. Your understanding of how well you are doing (or not doing) is directly tied to how you perceive the others around you doing. Essentially we keep a group of people in our heads; friends, family, co-workers, etc, that we use as our core group. How our group collectively functions we take in as a measure of ourselves.

But our understanding doesn’t just stop there. All of these relationships are skewed through the lens of narration. If a friend or family member is facing cancer, they are not just sick, they are a hero battling like against an implacable foe. This is because our brains keep them in story format, complete with heroes and villains. Mind you, we’re not putting little capes on them in our minds, the process is usually not quite that obvious, but the basic structure of our thoughts mirror story structure.

There’s a lot in the books about why we do this. I am working my way through all that, but for me the most important part is the process. Not Why we do, but What we do. What is this narrative thing? How does it work? What does it mean, and How can we use it?

A tale of two stories.

I remember–back after almost a year of covid and vaccines were suddenly available–being gobsmacked at how so many Americans not only didn’t want a vaccine, but rallied against it. Why would someone think playing Russian Roulette (albeit on a gun with a lot of chambers) was such a great idea? Why was there all this needless division over something that struck me as obviously beneficial? The answer is, they were hearing another story, one that people in my immediate group couldn’t hear. And in their story, the vaccine (or someone who represented the vaccine, like Dr. Fauci) was the villain. In our story the vaccine was the hero.

What?

Imagine you and your best friend are both reading a book for a class. The books have the same tittle and the same author, but between the covers the stories are vastly different. Imagine how confusing it would be when you’re talking about your favorite part of the novel to your friend and they suddenly start asking, “Wait, in your book Frodo is the good guy?” And you nod your head, like of course. And then your friend asks, “And that Sauron guy isn’t trying to save the ring?” And you’re like “WTF?!?! Save the ring, from whom?” And they say, “From the hobbits who stole it, of course.” And right at that moment you really start to believe your best friend is stone cold crazy. How could they even get such an idea?

The thing is, it’s right there in their book. It’s just their book is different from yours, because their circle of friends is slightly different, so they see and measure the world slightly differently.

The irony is both you and your friend will feel terribly hurt and confused. Neither will understand why the other is acting so crazy. And worse, the more one of you tries to convince the other of their error, the more thy will believe in it. After all, in their book Sauron is the hero, it’s plain as day. Everyone can see it. Why can’t you? You are the crazy one. They are perfectly fine. Everyone in their circle (but you) agrees with them. Their story is the true one.

This is what I think was happening during covid. We had two sides fighting not over a vaccine, but over the roll in the story that the vaccine played. We had a hero camp and a villain camp, and the two sides could not be further apart, over something a year before they would have 100% agreed upon.

So how do you fix this? What do you do when your friend or your family members are reading from a slightly different book? I don’t know the answer yet. I’m still working on it, but I think it comes down to making up a third story that you both can believe in. And if I am right, it might be even easy to do.

We’ll see.

Who is shooting who in the Culture War?

Charlie Jane Anders sent out a fabulous piece yesterday called Maybe endless stories about escalating wars weren’t a great idea after all on her mailing list (which I highly recommend, btw). The piece is about story structure and its effects in the real world. Her main point is that one of the standard story structures you see in fiction (called a rising action) can be seen being mirrored in the world around us.

In a rising action, the hero faces a seemingly endless escalation of conflict. Then right at the last possible moment, they save the day, usually against all odds. You see this story structure not only in most novels, but in most movies and tv shows. Marvel movies all do this, as do pretty much every popcorn movie. You see it in every thing from Rocky, to Top Gun to even Star Wars. Even much of the more highbrow stories in movies and tv follow this pattern.

I’m not going to disagree with Charlie Jane. I think her point is spot on. My only quibble is I think she is aiming too low.

I’ve long thought that this kind of dramatic story structure is found not just in our media, but in our day-to-day lives. Ever since I first stumbled upon the short and densely packed Three Uses of a Knife by David Mamet, with its opening chapter on wind chill, I realized that humans don’t just consume dramatic stories in our media, we generate them. Once you know where to look you see stories everywhere. Even something prosaic as buying coffee, can be made into a story.

No one just buys a coffee. They have to park their car, then wait in line, someone needs to take their order, then they have to wait for their name to be called. Finally they need to check if their order is correct. Each of this steps offers a chance for drama. Either this name is misspelled, or someone cuts in line, or the barista gets the coffee wrong, or their name. Something is almost guaranteed to happen, and when it does we will immediately recognize it as drama. Someone is doing something against our friend. We know this instinctively. We know they will buy a coffee, we will see them with the coffee in their hand. We already know how the story is going to end, and yet if told right, and if enough events occur, a good teller can make the story last three minutes or more, and have everyone around them laughing of crying.

But even the simplest of stories do this. It’s really hard to tell someone about your day without it automatically being converted to story structure.

My inexpert name for this phenomena is the Narration.* That is, we take simple occurrences in our lives, and convert them into a story. Usually this story has rising conflict and comes to a conclusion. Most importantly the story has a hero, or a protagonist. Usually the hero is ourselves. All stories we tell are reflective of this, even the stories we tell about others say as much about ourselves. But for a story to work the hero needs a villain, or an antagonist. Sometimes there isn’t a definable antagonist, but more like what they call in fiction writing “forces of antagonism.” For instance, if someone tells you the wind knocked them over, we generally don’t think of the wind was actually trying to kill them, we understand it was making things more difficult for them. The wind isn’t necessarily a villain, but it is playing the role (for the sake of the story) as one.

btw, you can also find forces of protagonism in stories. If you’ve ever watched a leaf boat make its way down the gutter on a rainy day, (some of the best drama you will ever experience with a toddler) then you know what it is like to see a leaf become a hero. Certainly no one thinks the leaf is directing its actions, and yet that is exactly what we tell ourselves.

So a story needs at least four things: A rising action, a conclusion, a hero, and a villain. And like I said above, once you start to look for these things, you find them everywhere.

My main point to all this, and why I mentioned Charlie Jane’s piece at the top, is that I believe humans natively think in Narration. It is our default setting, so to speak. That is, we inherently think in story structure.

If this is true, then it’s not that Hollywood, or big publishing is leading us into ever more drama, it’s that we are naturally doing it ourselves. Narrative is internal and essential to the human experience. Why else would we sit through a two hour popcorn movie and find it entertaining if it wasn’t speaking to our inner language? Why else sit for hours with a good book, or binge all night a TV series?

We not only think in Narration, we demand it back from the world. Things that are not natively in Narrative form we don’t understand. It is foreign to us. Don’t believe me, trying explaining quantum mechanics, climate change, or the holy trinity to someone you don’t know. At some point it will become difficult because there are some things that naturally resist the Narrative format. Sure, things are happening, you might even have some data, but that date doesn’t lend itself well to a story, and thus it’s hard to comprehend.

As to culture wars, you can see here my idea on those. To me, culture wars have existed forever. They are intrinsic to the human experience, just like Narration. As soon as you have a bunch of people think of themselves as a “group,” then they automatically become the heroes or their story. Once that happens then Narration will insist that someone else play the role of the antagonist. You need an opposing team, be they Democrats or the Chicago Bulls. At that point, all it takes is the least bit of provocation, and suddenly a story bursts forth. Both sides will be neatly lined up, and the result will be deeply satisfying to everyone.

Once you understand this, then politics makes a lot more sense. Sports too. Why else to we prefer to see two teams compete against each other, or two individuals athletes. It’s because one plays the role of the hero, and the other the villain.

Anyway, I challenge you to pay attention to this idea in your day-to-day communications. See if you don’t find the Narrative everywhere.




*I’m sure someone had a better term for it, I just don’t know it.




So about last year

I didn’t post much last year. This is not me apologizing, it’s just a fact. I was busy writing, just not blogging, but since this blog is a perfect place to drop historical markers, here is something from last year.

In 2024 I wrote:

Two Novels. Mind the Slice Book 1 and Speaker For the Dead. *

Nine stories from scratch, including one that weighs in at slightly over 20k words

Three incomplete stories from years past got dusted off, and finished.

In total, that’s well over 200k words, and probably closer to 250k. All writing a few hours every weekday morning.

Also in 2024 I earned 22 rejections for my short stories. I’m not trying to suggest this number is meaningful, except that is it evidence I am still swinging.

And that’s it. It was by far my most productive year. I expect to get even more productive as I go. We’ll see.

* Technically, Mind the Slice Book 1 is a revision of a much longer novel that was broken into three novels, and Speaker For the Dead is a novel I started and stepped away from in 2014. In both cases, much of the writing was new material, with occasional older chapters folded back in. For instance, the original Speaker had a mid 20s male as the protagonist, and he was boring as fuck. I’m sure that was why the novel originally stalled. Last year I was looking over the parts, and the chapters I had written for a side character (Lissa, a 47 year old black woman) just leapt off the page. I did a quick outline with her as the protagonist, dumping most of the original boring material, and three months later the book was finished.

Culture, an Analogy

“The ultimate hidden truth of the world is that it is something that we make, and could just as easily make differently…” – David Graeber 

Many years ago I had a sort of epiphany about what culture is, and how it works. At the time I chose to not write it down, in part due to my own laziness, and in part to see if it was a genuinely good idea. I often have ideas that fail to make it the full light of day before imploding. Such is the nature of creativity. The impulse is kind, but its offspring are not always lasting or well-thought. 

Over the years my little analogy grew to reflect changes in the outside world. I saw arguments in politics over the culture wars (which, far from being a recent phenomena, dates back to the beginnings of recorded history), I saw massive changes in the media that artists use (from vinyl to CDs, from DVDs to streaming, and from AOL to the targeted social media we have today), and I saw every day recommendations (over books or screen time, or the value of letting a child play outdoors), and they all struck me as somehow being connected.

The question remained: How? How are these seemingly disparate elements connected? My answer is the stone.

The evidence for my analogy comes mostly in the form of observation. I have no formal education into the nature of culture, and in fact have barely scratched the surface in terms of research. All of what you read comes from a simple yet central idea. What if all the things that humanity argues about were just variations on the same thing? What if this thing was something that grew over time, evolved as it were. Ideas battling it out with other ideas until eventually one was the victor. After all, we no longer argue over the divine right of kings, or assume that mental illness comes about from demon possession. Why is that? What made those changes happen? It was cultural, sure, but how? How does culture work? How does it evolve? 

It was in attempting to answer those questions that this analogy came into being.

The Stone

Imagine if you will, a massive wheel of stone that is hundreds of miles wide and perhaps equally as large in diameter. The stone travels slowly over a large flat plain, completing a single revolution once per year, so that the part which is currently at the very top will be on the top again in precisely 365 days. The weight of this stone is crushing, destroying everything in its path. Behind it is a transformed landscape marking its passage that goes back for millennia. The stone is almost inconceivably large, and is unstoppable in its rotation. 

Upon the face of this stone are people. We will call them sculptors, though they go by many different names: Artists, writers, painters, dancers, singers, songwriters, chefs, architects, musicians, scientists, etc. They are of all shape, sizes, color, nationality, and religion. Each day these sculptors work upon the surface of the stone, battering and hammering into the hard face with their tools. Their goal is to affect the stone in such a way that when it reaches soil below it will use its massive weight to stamp an impression into the dirt that will last year after year beyond its passage. Some sculptors work singularly, some work in large groups. The work is hot, heavy, and dangerous. The very top is the safest place to work, and that is where you’ll find most of the sculptors, but the stone remains underneath that area for only a short time. Those that wish to influence a particular section beyond that short moment, must invent ropes and pulleys and other contraptions to hold themselves to the ever rotating surface while they work. If you start too early you’ll discover that the stone, fresh from compacting the soil, is embedded in a thick layer of dirt. If you stay too late upon the other side you risk the very real chance of being crushed by your own work. Every year the stone in its undying rotation creates hundreds if not thousands of casualties. The price for inattention is high.

All of humanity is deeply interested in what the sculptors do, but the vast majority do not live upon the stone. Either they find the work disinteresting, too dangerous, or perhaps they have some other reason. Instead, most people live in the impressions left behind by the passage of the stone, for as the stone moves it leaves behind vast buildings made of compressed soil, some so large they become massive unending cities. Also left behind are sculptures, and trees, comfortably shaded benches to sit upon, toys for children and adults, pools, and roads, auditoriums, and churches, and cathedrals, cars and trains, musical instruments of every style, and vast platforms that twist and swirl for dancers to perform upon.  All that is needed is a little bit of scrubbing, and a little bit of digging, and the impressions from the stone can be made livable. Don’t like the house you’re in? Wait a year and try the next version. Hopefully, the architect up on the stone will listen to your requests. Of course, you can always pay them, for many of the sculptors are paid by the people below to create things for their use. Not all sculptors are paid. Some work for the joy, or desire. Some for the notoriety. It is said that one sculptor, by the name of Jesus, hit a crack in the face at just the right moment that it caused a massive avalanche of stone to fall. You can still see the impression of his work today. Some claim this Jesus was buried in the rubble of his own creation, and popped up, alive and healthy, three days later on the other side. His own work sheltering him from the weight of the stone. Alas, no one can travel back that far in the stone’s wake and check. 

This, then, is our culture. The stone. It is both something that concerns us all, and yet is something we can also contribute to. It is the most democratic of mediums, although some groups do in fact limit who among them can work its surface. Some people by hammering away find great success, but the vast majority of sculptors do not. Most know of the stone only by the impression it leaves behind. Some live so far from the stone that they have never seen its motion. By now, the entire surface of the stone has been marked by humanity, much of it for thousands of rotations. That doesn’t mean one cannot go in and try to reshape any area they desire, but the stone is hard, and the work is difficult, and there might be just as many sculptors wishing to carve the stone in the entirely opposite direction. The battle is the work, and the work is the battle, and all of us, all of humanity, are affected by the outcome.